In his groundbreaking 1980 Tanner Lectures on Human Values at Stanford University, titled Equality of What?, Nobel laureate Amartya Sen challenged conventional approaches to measuring equality. He argued that focusing solely on marginal or total utility (happiness or satisfaction) or primary goods (resources like income or wealth) was inadequate for assessing human well-being. Instead, Sen proposed that social systems should prioritize expanding people’s capabilities—their real freedoms and opportunities to achieve the lives they value. This idea, known as the Capabilities Approach, shifted the focus from what people have to what they can do and be. Below, we explore the key concepts of Sen’s framework, followed by Martha Nussbaum’s complementary Capability Theory of Justice, presented in a clear, engaging, and detailed manner.
Amartya Sen’s Capabilities Approach: Core Concepts
Sen’s Capabilities Approach redefines well-being by emphasizing the freedoms individuals have to live fulfilling lives. It moves beyond material wealth or subjective happiness to focus on the practical opportunities people have to achieve their goals. Here are the key elements of his theory:
Functionings: The Building Blocks of Well-Being
Functionings are the specific activities people do or states of being they achieve that contribute to their well-being. These can range from basic activities like eating nutritious food or staying healthy to complex ones like participating in community life or pursuing creative passions. For example, being well-nourished is a functioning, as is having the confidence to engage in public debates. Importantly, Sen separates functionings from the commodities used to achieve them. A bicycle, for instance, is a commodity, but the functioning it enables is mobility—being able to travel freely. This distinction highlights that owning resources doesn’t guarantee well-being; what matters is what people can do with them.
Capabilities: The Freedom to Choose a Valued Life
Capabilities represent the set of functionings a person can achieve, given their freedoms and opportunities. They reflect the real choices individuals have to live a life they value. For example, a person with access to education, nutritious food, and healthcare has the capability to achieve functionings like learning, staying healthy, or securing a job. Capabilities are about potential—the freedom to choose among various life paths. A key insight is that two people with the same resources (e.g., income) may have different capabilities due to factors like disability, gender, or social barriers. Sen’s focus on capabilities underscores that equality isn’t just about equal resources but about equal opportunities to live well.
Agency: The Power to Act on Valued Goals
Agency refers to a person’s ability to pursue goals they value and to act as an active participant in their own life. An agent is someone who can make choices and take actions to shape their future, rather than being a passive recipient of circumstances. For instance, a woman who chooses to start a business because it aligns with her ambitions is exercising agency. Agency is central to Sen’s framework because it emphasizes empowerment and self-determination, not just access to resources.
Identifying Key Functionings for a Good Life
Sen argues that societies should prioritize certain crucially important capabilities tied to basic needs, such as adequate nutrition, health, education, and shelter. Identifying these priorities helps establish moral and political goals, especially in developing countries where poverty limits people’s freedoms. By focusing on essential capabilities, policymakers can assess the extent and nature of deprivation and design interventions that expand opportunities. For example, ensuring access to clean water enhances the capability for health, which is foundational for other achievements like education or work.
Evaluating Capabilities: What Shapes Freedom?
Assessing a person’s capabilities involves examining the freedoms they have to choose high-quality life options. Sen identifies several factors that influence capabilities:
Individual Physiology: Personal characteristics like age, gender, or disabilities affect what functionings are achievable. For instance, a person with a physical disability may need adaptive tools to achieve mobility.
Local Environment Diversity: Geographical factors, such as living in a rural area with poor infrastructure, can limit access to opportunities like healthcare or education.
Variation in Social Conditions: Cultural norms, discrimination, or social hierarchies (e.g., based on caste or gender) can restrict freedoms.
Differences in Rational Perspectives: People’s values and priorities shape the functionings they pursue. One person might prioritize career success, while another values family life.
Distribution Within the Family: Resources and opportunities are often unequally distributed within households, with women or children sometimes receiving less.
By considering these factors, Sen’s framework provides a nuanced way to evaluate well-being and identify barriers to equality.
Martha Nussbaum’s Capability Theory of Justice
Building on Sen’s ideas, philosopher Martha Nussbaum developed a more structured version of the Capabilities Approach, known as the Capability Theory of Justice. Nussbaum’s framework is explicitly normative, aiming to define a universal set of entitlements that every person should have to live a dignified, flourishing life. She proposes a list of ten Central Capabilities that governments and societies should guarantee as a minimum standard of justice. Below, we explore the key capabilities she emphasizes, presented in a way that highlights their importance to human dignity.
Life
Every person should have the opportunity to live a full human life of normal length, free from preventable causes of premature death, such as disease, malnutrition, or violence. This capability is foundational, as all other freedoms depend on being alive.
Bodily Health
Good health, including access to adequate nutrition, clean water, and reproductive healthcare, is essential for well-being. This capability ensures people can thrive physically and pursue other goals, like education or work, without being hindered by illness or hunger.
Bodily Integrity
People should have the freedom to move safely and securely through the world, without fear of violence, sexual assault, or domestic abuse. This capability also includes control over one’s body, such as the right to make reproductive choices or live free from coercion.
Senses, Imagination, and Thought
Humans flourish when they can use their senses to imagine, think, and reason in ways that are cultivated through education, including literacy, mathematics, and scientific inquiry. This capability also includes the freedom to engage in creative pursuits like music, literature, or art, and to express oneself according to personal interests and values. For example, a person should be able to read poetry or play an instrument if they choose, supported by an environment that nurtures these abilities.
Emotions
Emotional well-being involves the ability to form attachments to people, places, or things, and to experience emotions like love, grief, or joy without suppression. This capability recognizes the importance of relationships—loving those who care for us, mourning their loss, or celebrating shared moments—as central to a meaningful life.
Practical Reason
People should be able to reflect critically on what constitutes a good life and make plans to achieve it. This capability involves forming a personal conception of well-being and engaging in thoughtful decision-making, such as choosing a career or balancing family responsibilities.
Affiliation
Humans are social beings who thrive through connection and mutual respect. This capability includes two aspects:
Living with Others: Being able to form relationships, engage in social interactions, and participate in communities.
Dignity and Non-Humiliation: Being treated as an equal, with self-respect and without discrimination or degradation. This ensures that social systems uphold everyone’s worth, regardless of gender, race, or status.
(Nussbaum’s full list includes three additional capabilities—Other Species, Play, and Control Over One’s Environment—but the above seven are often highlighted as core to her framework.)
Why These Ideas Matter
Sen and Nussbaum’s capabilities frameworks offer a transformative way to think about equality, justice, and human development. By focusing on capabilities—the real freedoms people have to live lives they value—they move beyond simplistic metrics like income or happiness. Sen’s approach is flexible, emphasizing context-specific priorities and individual agency, while Nussbaum’s provides a universal blueprint for justice, ensuring that all people have the minimum conditions for a dignified life. Together, their ideas challenge societies to address not just resource distribution but the structural barriers—poverty, discrimination, lack of education—that limit human potential.
For example, consider two women with the same income: one lives in a city with access to quality schools and healthcare, while the other lives in a rural area with no hospitals and cultural norms that restrict her mobility. Their capabilities differ vastly, even if their incomes are equal. Sen and Nussbaum’s frameworks help identify these disparities and guide policies to expand opportunities, such as building schools, improving healthcare, or challenging discriminatory norms.
Conclusion
Amartya Sen’s Capabilities Approach and Martha Nussbaum’s Capability Theory of Justice redefine what it means to live a good life. Sen emphasizes the freedom to achieve valued functionings through capabilities and agency, urging societies to prioritize essential needs and evaluate barriers to opportunity. Nussbaum complements this by outlining specific capabilities—like health, bodily integrity, and emotional well-being—that form the foundation of a just society. Together, their ideas inspire a vision of equality that is not about sameness but about empowering every individual to flourish in their own way. By focusing on what people can do and be, these frameworks offer a humane, practical guide for tackling poverty, inequality, and injustice in our world.
Comments
Post a Comment