Skip to main content

Translate

Amartya Sen's Capability Approach

 Amartya Sen, in 1980, in his Tanner Lectures on human values titled 'Equality of What' at Stanford University, questioned the adequacy of using marginal or total utility and primary goods for measuring equality. The social systems should aim to expand the people's capabilities or their freedom to achieve beings and doings which they value. 

Various concepts of the capabilities  theory of Amartya Sen are discussed below :


1. Functionings: Functionings are doing the activity or being in a state that contributes to a person's well-being. Functionings should be separated from the commodities employed to achieve them. 

2. Capabilities: Capability is a set of functions a human being can achieve when a person has the freedom and opportunity to choose/select a quality of life that he has reason to value. 

3. Agency- Agency refers to any goal/target a person wishes to achieve what he had valued. A person who possesses this ability or agency is the agent.

4. Choosing the most important functioning for a good life- Sen suggests that identification of crucially important capabilities associated with basic needs can help set up moral and political priorities. This kind of exercise can help assess the extent and nature of poverty in developing countries. 
5. Evaluation of capability to live a good life

Evaluating capability concerns assessing the freedom that people have to choose high-quality options. Some determinants are
 A. Individual Physiology, B. Local Environment diversity, C. Variation in social condition, D. differences in rational perspectives,  E. Distribution within the family 

Martha Nussbaum's capability theory of Justice stresses the following points.

1. Life - Being able to live to the end of human life of normal length.
2. Bodily health: Being able to have good health, including reproductive health; being adequately nourished.

3. Bodily integrity: Being able to move freely from place to place: to be secure from violent assaults including sexual assaults and domestic violence.
4. Sense, Imagination and Thought. - Being able to use the sense to imagine, think and reason- and to do so these things in a "truly human" way, a way informed and cultivated through education and mathematical and scientific way. Being able to experience and choose as per own wish and interest in music, literature etc. 

5. Emotion: Being able to have an attachment to people or things outside ourselves, to love those who love us and care for us, to grieve in their absence etc. 


6. Practical Reason- Being able to form a conception of the good and to engage in critical reflection about the planning of one's life. 

7. Affiliation - Recognize and show concern, social bases of self-respect and non-humiliation: being able to be treated as a dignified being whose worth is equal to that of others.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Understanding NPS and UPS Provisions Through Case Studies – Death and Disablement in Service

The National Pension System (NPS) and the Unified Pension Scheme (UPS) provide distinct benefits for Central Government employees in India, especially in cases of unforeseen events like death or disablement during service. To help employees and their families understand these provisions, we will analyze two real-world case studies based on the latest Office Memoranda (OMs): DoPPW OM dated October 26, 2022 (CCS NPS Rules, 2021) for NPS Finance Ministry Notification dated January 24, 2025 (UPS effective from April 1, 2025) These case studies will clarify benefits, eligibility criteria, and potential financial outcomes under both schemes. Case Study 1: NPS – Death of an Employee in Service Employee Profile Name: Rajesh Kumar Age: 42 Service Duration: 15 years (Joined on January 1, 2010) Basic Pay: ₹80,000/month (including Dearness Allowance) NPS Contribution: 10% (₹8,000/month) by Rajesh, 14% (₹11,200/month) by the government Accumulated Corpus: ₹45 lakh (by April 2025) Family: W...

Criticism of Rosenstein's theory of Big Push of Balanced Development

Some of the criticism of Rosenstein's theory of the Big Push method of balanced development is as follows: 1. Big Push Theory can not be effectively adopted in developing countries a lack sufficient funds, skilled labor, and dynamic entrepreneurship abilities. 2. Maintaining coordination between different sectors is a big challenge, According to H. Myint, It is very difficult to coordinate various plans in developing countries. 3. Developing economy is basically an agrarian economy whereas Rodan's theory of Big Push theory emphasizes on investment in industries which is troublesome in the first stage in many countries that lack basic infrastructure, skilled labor, and raw materials.  4. The theory of the big push method of balanced development is dependent on indivisibility. Too much indivisibility will pose practical problems in the process of globalization which lay stress on flexibility and reforms. 5. Rosenstein Rodan has given limited importance to the role of internationa...

Ranger Nurkse's theory of balanced growth

R. Nurkse's theory of balanced growth believes that underdeveloped countries are suffering from the  vicious circle of poverty, which is determinantal to economic development in these countries.  According to him "a circular constellation of forces, tending to act and react upon one another in such   a way as to keep a country in a state of poverty." The vicious circle of poverty adversely affects  the accumulation of capital in economically underdeveloped countries. If this vicious circle of poverty is broken then development will follow.  According to Nurkse "the expansion of the market can be realized only through a process of balanced growth, where people in different countries,  working with new and better tools, become each other's consumers. The vicious cycle works on both the demand and supply sides. On the supply side, there is a small capacity to save due to a low level  of income, the low level of income results in low productivity whic...