Skip to main content

Translate

Ranger Nurkse's theory of balanced growth

R. Nurkse's theory of balanced growth believes that underdeveloped countries are suffering from the vicious circle of poverty, which is determinantal to economic development in these countries. 

According to him "a circular constellation of forces, tending to act and react upon one another in such  a way as to keep a country in a state of poverty." The vicious circle of poverty adversely affects the accumulation of capital in economically underdeveloped countries.

If this vicious circle of poverty is broken then development will follow. 

According to Nurkse "the expansion of the market can be realized only through

a process of balanced growth, where people in different countries, working with new and better tools, become each other's consumers.

The vicious cycle works on both the demand and supply sides. On the supply side, there is a small capacity to save due to a low level of income, the low level of income results in low productivity which is again due to a deficiency of capital which is the effect of a low capacity to save. On the contrary, on the demand side, the inducement to invest is low due to low demand in the economy, which is because of low income. This is how the vicious circle works on both supply and demand sides. 

Operation of the vicious circle of poverty limits the size of the market in underdevelopment countries. 

Nurkse believes that the vicious circle of poverty can be broken through balanced growth. he was of the view that the vicious circle can be broken by enlarging the size of the market which cannot be done by an individual investor.

It would be possible with the help of a group of investors in the market. Therefore, the enlargement of the market is possible with the help of the development of complementary industries. This can break the vicious circle of poverty and release the forces of growth and expansion. He also suggested that market size can be expanded by salesmanship and advertising and infrastructure development. 

Nurkse was of the view that the principle of balanced growth needs a balance between different sectors of the economy during the process of economic growth and development.


These are :

(1) Balance between agriculture and industry.

(2) Balance between domestic and foreign trade.

(3) Balance between demand and supply factor.


Lewis viewed that if agriculture stagnates, the capitalist sector can not grow, capitalist profit remains a small part of the national income, and savings and investments are correspondingly small. Smooth economic development 

requires that industry and agriculture should grow together.

Some of the benefits of balanced growth:

1. Balanced growth can better promote equitable and balanced regional development 

2. Balanced growth can pave the way for the division of labor and thus can raise the specialization and development of the productivity of the labor force.

3. When there is balanced growth of both agriculture and industry, it will lead to the creation of social overhead capital for effective growth of all these sectoral activities

4. it will boost foreign trade as the expansion of both internal and external markets of products in an economy. 

5. It will lead to better utilization of both natural and human resources of an economy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Unified Pension Scheme (UPS) vs. National Pension System (NPS)

  The Indian government's introduction of the Unified Pension Scheme (UPS), effective from April 1, 2025, marks a significant shift in retirement planning for central government employees. This new scheme aims to combine the predictability of the Old Pension Scheme (OPS) with the contributory nature of the National Pension System (NPS). For employees seeking a stable and assured post-retirement income, UPS presents a compelling alternative to the market-linked NPS. Key Differences Between UPS and NPS 1. Pension Structure 2. Employee and Government Contributions 3. Inflation Adjustment 4. Family Pension 5. Lump Sum Payment at Retirement Comparative Example: UPS vs. NPS UPS : Provides a guaranteed pension amounting to 50% of the average basic pay from the last 12 months of service, given a minimum of 25 years of service. For those with 10 to 25 years of service, the pension is proportionate to their service duration, with a minimum pension of ₹10,000 per month. NPS : Offers a p...

New-Age Free Trade Agreements: Shaping India’s Economic Future

     In an era of global economic realignment, India stands at a pivotal juncture, leveraging new-age Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) to propel its ambition of becoming a $5 trillion economy by 2030 and a global trade powerhouse. Unlike their predecessors, which focused narrowly on tariff reductions, modern FTAs are comprehensive, encompassing digital trade, intellectual property rights (IPR), sustainability, labor standards, and geopolitical strategies. For India, these agreements are not mere trade pacts but strategic instruments to drive export-led growth, attract foreign direct investment (FDI), enhance industrial competitiveness, and foster inclusive development.      As of May 2025, India’s merchandise exports stand at $437 billion (April 2024–February 2025), with services exports at $340 billion, and FTAs are poised to amplify these figures. Yet, the path is fraught with challenges—trade deficits, domestic capacity constraints, and geopolitical trade-of...

Understanding NPS and UPS Provisions Through Case Studies – Death and Disablement in Service

The National Pension System (NPS) and the Unified Pension Scheme (UPS) provide distinct benefits for Central Government employees in India, especially in cases of unforeseen events like death or disablement during service. To help employees and their families understand these provisions, we will analyze two real-world case studies based on the latest Office Memoranda (OMs): DoPPW OM dated October 26, 2022 (CCS NPS Rules, 2021) for NPS Finance Ministry Notification dated January 24, 2025 (UPS effective from April 1, 2025) These case studies will clarify benefits, eligibility criteria, and potential financial outcomes under both schemes. Case Study 1: NPS – Death of an Employee in Service Employee Profile Name: Rajesh Kumar Age: 42 Service Duration: 15 years (Joined on January 1, 2010) Basic Pay: ₹80,000/month (including Dearness Allowance) NPS Contribution: 10% (₹8,000/month) by Rajesh, 14% (₹11,200/month) by the government Accumulated Corpus: ₹45 lakh (by April 2025) Family: W...