Skip to main content

Translate

The Marxian Economic System in the context of Development


The Marxian economics system is composed of four components 

a) The capitalist economic system 

b) the labour theory of value

c) the theory of surplus labour 

d) The theory of capital accumulation 

 The Capitalist Economy system

According to Karl Marx, the capitalist system of Economy consists of the following elements - 

a. The Capitalist system is divided into two sections - A. The Capitalists B. The Worker 

b. A commodity forms the unit of production in a capitalist society where the commodity is defined as the carrier of use-value (utility) and exchange-value (with other commodities) 

c. The growth of capitalism is based upon the exploitation of labour. 

d. All the commodity is produced with the motive of profit and exchange equation in m-C-M. The capitalist purchases commodity, C, (Labour power) with money, m , with an intention to sell it (after production) for profit, M. 

v) The motive force behind capitalism is profit. the capitalists also reinvest the profit to upgrade technology.

vi) the capitalist also adopts labour-saving technology to keep away manpower from work that creates unemployment.

The Labour Theory of Value 

According to Marx, the value of a commodity is determined by the quantity of labour required to reproduce it. One commodity has both use-value and exchange-value. When commodities represent use values, they are quantitively different due to different forms of useful labour used in them.

Marx was an advocate of the labour theory of value and believe that all production belongs to labour because workers produce all products within the society. Marx had predicted that capitalists will keep the workers in misery because the sole purpose of a capitalist is to generate wealth by gaining maximum profit out of product and that's why they provide subsentential amounts to workers.

The Theory of Surplus value 

The workers have the characteristic of being capable to produce more than the value of the workforce and the surplus amount produced by workers is used by capitalists to profit in return they don't provide anything to workers and in this way they exploit workers.

The Theory of capital accumulation

Marx stated that capitalists accumulate the wealth to make a profit for the following two major reasons -

(i) The emergence of surplus value in capitalist production includes the capitalist accumulating and to re-invest.

(ii) The mass effect of this all-around expansion of production is an increase in demand for labour, rise in wage rate and reduction in surplus value because the surplus value is simply the access of total produce over subsistence produce. This provides another reason for an individual capitalist to accumulate. 

The Marxian model of economic development 

Marx has contributed to the theory of economic development in three ways :

1. He formulated the materialistic interpretation of history

2. He specified the motivating force for economic development 

3. he suggested an alternating path for planned economic development 


Symbolically, the Marxian theory of Economic Development can be summarised in these formulas:

1. Q (Total output) = f {(Size of the labour force), K (Capital), R ( Amount of land), T (Technological progress)}

2. Technological progress depends on investment (T=I)

3. Investment depends on the rate of profit 

4. Rate of profit depends on the surplus amount of production 

5. Wage depends on the level of investment and employment 

6. labour employment depends on the amount of investment.

7. Consumption expenditure depends on the wage bill. 

8. Profit is determined by the level of technology and consumption. 

9. Total output = profit + wages

10. The economy has two sectors; consumer goods and producer goods sectors. so, the total output is the sum of consumer goods and producer goods. 

- ShashanK Priyadarshi 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New-Age Free Trade Agreements: Shaping India’s Economic Future

     In an era of global economic realignment, India stands at a pivotal juncture, leveraging new-age Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) to propel its ambition of becoming a $5 trillion economy by 2030 and a global trade powerhouse. Unlike their predecessors, which focused narrowly on tariff reductions, modern FTAs are comprehensive, encompassing digital trade, intellectual property rights (IPR), sustainability, labor standards, and geopolitical strategies. For India, these agreements are not mere trade pacts but strategic instruments to drive export-led growth, attract foreign direct investment (FDI), enhance industrial competitiveness, and foster inclusive development.      As of May 2025, India’s merchandise exports stand at $437 billion (April 2024–February 2025), with services exports at $340 billion, and FTAs are poised to amplify these figures. Yet, the path is fraught with challenges—trade deficits, domestic capacity constraints, and geopolitical trade-of...

Unified Pension Scheme (UPS) vs. National Pension System (NPS)

  The Indian government's introduction of the Unified Pension Scheme (UPS), effective from April 1, 2025, marks a significant shift in retirement planning for central government employees. This new scheme aims to combine the predictability of the Old Pension Scheme (OPS) with the contributory nature of the National Pension System (NPS). For employees seeking a stable and assured post-retirement income, UPS presents a compelling alternative to the market-linked NPS. Key Differences Between UPS and NPS 1. Pension Structure 2. Employee and Government Contributions 3. Inflation Adjustment 4. Family Pension 5. Lump Sum Payment at Retirement Comparative Example: UPS vs. NPS UPS : Provides a guaranteed pension amounting to 50% of the average basic pay from the last 12 months of service, given a minimum of 25 years of service. For those with 10 to 25 years of service, the pension is proportionate to their service duration, with a minimum pension of ₹10,000 per month. NPS : Offers a p...

Ranger Nurkse's theory of balanced growth

R. Nurkse's theory of balanced growth believes that underdeveloped countries are suffering from the  vicious circle of poverty, which is determinantal to economic development in these countries.  According to him "a circular constellation of forces, tending to act and react upon one another in such   a way as to keep a country in a state of poverty." The vicious circle of poverty adversely affects  the accumulation of capital in economically underdeveloped countries. If this vicious circle of poverty is broken then development will follow.  According to Nurkse "the expansion of the market can be realized only through a process of balanced growth, where people in different countries,  working with new and better tools, become each other's consumers. The vicious cycle works on both the demand and supply sides. On the supply side, there is a small capacity to save due to a low level  of income, the low level of income results in low productivity whic...