Skip to main content

Translate

W. A. Lewis' Theory of Unlimited Supply of Labour & It's Criticism

Topics:

W. A. Lewis believed that in underdeveloped countries supply of labour is unlimited at a subsistence wage rate. Economic development takes place when this surplus labour is withdrawn from subsistence sectors and placed in the capitalist sector through capital accumulation. In other words, the transfer of labour from the labour surplus agriculture sector to the industry sector will promote the balanced development of both sectors. 

Lewis' model divided the economy into two major sectors i.e. the capitalist sector and the subsistence sector. The capitalist sector is defined as " the part of the economy which uses reproducible capital, and pays capitalists for the use thereof." In the capitalist sector, the use of capital is controlled by capitalists, who hire the service of the labour. On the other hand, the subsistence sector doesn't use reproducible capital hence total productivity is lower than the capitalist sector. 

However, industries require skilled labour, according to Lewis, skilled labour is only a quasi-bottleneck or a temporary bottleneck. Which can be removed by providing training facilities to unskilled workers. 

The key to economic development as per lewis' theory is capital formation and it is only possible by capitalism.

three components of Lewis' theory are as follows :


1. Role of Technology in Development.

2. Role of private capitalists in the development process.

3. Role of government. 

4. Role of bank credit.


Criticism of Lewis' Model of Development 

1. The theory assumes that the wage rate will remain constant till surplus labour in the capitalist market is exhausted which is unrealistic.

2. The assumption of the unlimited supply of labour in a developing country is also unrealistic.

3. It gives too much priority to the capitalistic market whereas leaving agriculture and another primary sector of the economy which are mostly interrelated. 

4. Lewis' theory assumes that marginal productivity in the agriculture/ substantial sector is almost zero which is not correct. Schultz thought that the marginal productivity of labour in an overpopulated economy would not be zero.

5. It is very difficult to find out the exact number of surplus labourers who would move from the substantial sector to the capitalist sector. 

6. Lewis assumes that the withdrawal of labour from substantial sectors will not affect productivity in the substantial market, which is not correct. 

Lewis also promulgated the concept of dualism for the post-war emerging economy where the modern, as well as traditionally backward sector, coexists. 

Labels

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Understanding NPS and UPS Provisions Through Case Studies – Death and Disablement in Service

The National Pension System (NPS) and the Unified Pension Scheme (UPS) provide distinct benefits for Central Government employees in India, especially in cases of unforeseen events like death or disablement during service. To help employees and their families understand these provisions, we will analyze two real-world case studies based on the latest Office Memoranda (OMs): DoPPW OM dated October 26, 2022 (CCS NPS Rules, 2021) for NPS Finance Ministry Notification dated January 24, 2025 (UPS effective from April 1, 2025) These case studies will clarify benefits, eligibility criteria, and potential financial outcomes under both schemes. Case Study 1: NPS – Death of an Employee in Service Employee Profile Name: Rajesh Kumar Age: 42 Service Duration: 15 years (Joined on January 1, 2010) Basic Pay: ₹80,000/month (including Dearness Allowance) NPS Contribution: 10% (₹8,000/month) by Rajesh, 14% (₹11,200/month) by the government Accumulated Corpus: ₹45 lakh (by April 2025) Family: W...
Post a Comment
Read more

Criticism of Rosenstein's theory of Big Push of Balanced Development

Some of the criticism of Rosenstein's theory of the Big Push method of balanced development is as follows: 1. Big Push Theory can not be effectively adopted in developing countries a lack sufficient funds, skilled labor, and dynamic entrepreneurship abilities. 2. Maintaining coordination between different sectors is a big challenge, According to H. Myint, It is very difficult to coordinate various plans in developing countries. 3. Developing economy is basically an agrarian economy whereas Rodan's theory of Big Push theory emphasizes on investment in industries which is troublesome in the first stage in many countries that lack basic infrastructure, skilled labor, and raw materials.  4. The theory of the big push method of balanced development is dependent on indivisibility. Too much indivisibility will pose practical problems in the process of globalization which lay stress on flexibility and reforms. 5. Rosenstein Rodan has given limited importance to the role of internationa...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ranger Nurkse's theory of balanced growth

R. Nurkse's theory of balanced growth believes that underdeveloped countries are suffering from the  vicious circle of poverty, which is determinantal to economic development in these countries.  According to him "a circular constellation of forces, tending to act and react upon one another in such   a way as to keep a country in a state of poverty." The vicious circle of poverty adversely affects  the accumulation of capital in economically underdeveloped countries. If this vicious circle of poverty is broken then development will follow.  According to Nurkse "the expansion of the market can be realized only through a process of balanced growth, where people in different countries,  working with new and better tools, become each other's consumers. The vicious cycle works on both the demand and supply sides. On the supply side, there is a small capacity to save due to a low level  of income, the low level of income results in low productivity whic...
Post a Comment
Read more