Skip to main content

Translate

Big Push Theory by Rosenstein Rodan

 Rosenstein Rodan's Theory of Balanced Growth 






Rosenstein Rodan advocates the "Big Push" theory which empathizes the concept of large comprehensive investment in an underdeveloped/ stagnant economy to boost the 

the cycle of economic activities. 

The theory states that investing in it by bit or piecemeal will not generate enough force that will push the economy to overcome the obstacles. 


The key factor of the theory of Rodan is "indivisibility". 

According to him, the indivisibility of inputs, outputs, or processes leads to increasing returns.

 He considered social overhead capitals such as power transport and communication to have greater indivisibility

features and are indirectly productive and have a long gestation period.

They can not be imported rather than internally generated. Their installation requires a sizeable initial lump of investment.

The social overhead capital is characterized by four indivisibility as follows:

1. It is irreversible in time.

2. It has minimum durability/

3. It has a long gestation period, and 

4. It has an irreducible minimum industry mix of a different kinds of public utility.

The indivisibility characteristics of social head capital are key production processes.

Not only indivisibility in production function of process, but Mr. Rodan also advocated for indivisibility in the demand and supply process to keep the market dynamic and vibrant. 


According to him, unless there is assurance that necessary complementary investment will occur, any single investment is too risky to be undertaken at all. The indivisibility demands required inter dependable industries. 


The other indivisibility which Rodan stressed is "The Supply of Saving."


A high quantum of investment requires a high volume of savings. However, in underdeveloped countries savings are low because of low income. To reduce the gap between income and expenditure, the rate of saving should be created. 

In the word of Rosenstein Rodan, a high minimum quantum of investment requires a high volume of saving which is difficult to achieve in low-income underdeveloped countries. The way out of the vicious circle is to have first an increase in income and to provide mechanisms that assure that savings are higher.

The application of Rosenstein Rodan's big push theory in underdeveloped countries requires balance in three major sector-balance between social overheads (SOCs) and directly productive activities (DPAs); Balance between consumers' goods industries and producers' goods industry: and Oriental and vertical balance within consumer goods sector.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New-Age Free Trade Agreements: Shaping India’s Economic Future

     In an era of global economic realignment, India stands at a pivotal juncture, leveraging new-age Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) to propel its ambition of becoming a $5 trillion economy by 2030 and a global trade powerhouse. Unlike their predecessors, which focused narrowly on tariff reductions, modern FTAs are comprehensive, encompassing digital trade, intellectual property rights (IPR), sustainability, labor standards, and geopolitical strategies. For India, these agreements are not mere trade pacts but strategic instruments to drive export-led growth, attract foreign direct investment (FDI), enhance industrial competitiveness, and foster inclusive development.      As of May 2025, India’s merchandise exports stand at $437 billion (April 2024–February 2025), with services exports at $340 billion, and FTAs are poised to amplify these figures. Yet, the path is fraught with challenges—trade deficits, domestic capacity constraints, and geopolitical trade-of...

Unified Pension Scheme (UPS) vs. National Pension System (NPS)

  The Indian government's introduction of the Unified Pension Scheme (UPS), effective from April 1, 2025, marks a significant shift in retirement planning for central government employees. This new scheme aims to combine the predictability of the Old Pension Scheme (OPS) with the contributory nature of the National Pension System (NPS). For employees seeking a stable and assured post-retirement income, UPS presents a compelling alternative to the market-linked NPS. Key Differences Between UPS and NPS 1. Pension Structure 2. Employee and Government Contributions 3. Inflation Adjustment 4. Family Pension 5. Lump Sum Payment at Retirement Comparative Example: UPS vs. NPS UPS : Provides a guaranteed pension amounting to 50% of the average basic pay from the last 12 months of service, given a minimum of 25 years of service. For those with 10 to 25 years of service, the pension is proportionate to their service duration, with a minimum pension of ₹10,000 per month. NPS : Offers a p...

Understanding NPS and UPS Provisions Through Case Studies – Death and Disablement in Service

The National Pension System (NPS) and the Unified Pension Scheme (UPS) provide distinct benefits for Central Government employees in India, especially in cases of unforeseen events like death or disablement during service. To help employees and their families understand these provisions, we will analyze two real-world case studies based on the latest Office Memoranda (OMs): DoPPW OM dated October 26, 2022 (CCS NPS Rules, 2021) for NPS Finance Ministry Notification dated January 24, 2025 (UPS effective from April 1, 2025) These case studies will clarify benefits, eligibility criteria, and potential financial outcomes under both schemes. Case Study 1: NPS – Death of an Employee in Service Employee Profile Name: Rajesh Kumar Age: 42 Service Duration: 15 years (Joined on January 1, 2010) Basic Pay: ₹80,000/month (including Dearness Allowance) NPS Contribution: 10% (₹8,000/month) by Rajesh, 14% (₹11,200/month) by the government Accumulated Corpus: ₹45 lakh (by April 2025) Family: W...