Skip to main content

Translate

Social Media: A Double-Edged Sword in Modern India


In today’s hyper-connected world, social media has become an integral part of our lives, shaping how we communicate, share ideas, and engage with the world. Unlike traditional media such as newspapers, television, or radio, social media is a dynamic ecosystem of online platforms designed for interaction, collaboration, and content creation. From social networking sites like Facebook to microblogging platforms like X, and from discussion forums to wikis, social media offers unparalleled opportunities for connection and expression. However, this transformative tool also brings significant challenges, including the spread of fake news, cyberbullying, and the amplification of hate speech, which can threaten social harmony and even national security. In this article, we’ll explore the evolution of social media, its impact on Indian society, and the latest government guidelines aimed at curbing its misuse, all while weaving in compelling facts, research, and real-world examples to keep you engaged.

The Rise of Social Media: A Global and Indian Phenomenon
Social media has evolved from a novelty to a cornerstone of modern communication. As of January 2025, there are over 5.07 billion social media users worldwide, according to DataReportal, representing more than 62% of the global population. In India, the numbers are equally staggering: a 2024 report by Statista estimates that India has over 650 million social media users, making it one of the largest markets for platforms like X, Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp. This growth is fueled by affordable smartphones and widespread internet access—India’s internet penetration rate reached 52% in 2024, up from 36% in 2019, as per the Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI).
What sets social media apart from traditional media is its interactivity and immediacy. Media richness theory, as outlined by Daft and Lengel (1986), highlights that social media platforms vary in their capacity to transmit information (media richness) and enable self-disclosure—the act of sharing personal information to build trust or project a certain image. For instance, a video on Instagram conveys more information than a text post on X, while a LinkedIn profile allows for greater self-disclosure than a fleeting Snapchat story. These features make social media a powerful tool for connection, but they also make it a breeding ground for misinformation and abuse.
The Dark Side of Social Media: Fake News and Communal Tensions
While social media has democratized information, it has also given rise to a dangerous phenomenon: fake news. A 2023 study by the University of Oxford found that 67% of social media users in India have encountered fake news, with 45% admitting they believed it at first glance. The speed at which misinformation spreads on platforms like WhatsApp is alarming—a 2021 report by the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Delhi revealed that a fake message on WhatsApp can reach 1 million users in under 24 hours due to the platform’s end-to-end encryption and group forwarding features.
The consequences of fake news are often devastating, particularly in a diverse and sensitive country like India. In July 2017, communal violence erupted in Basirhat, North 24 Parganas, West Bengal, after a misleading Facebook post by a Hindu boy about a local family’s conversion to Islam incited a Muslim mob to go on a rampage. The violence resulted in one death, dozens of injuries, and the destruction of several shops, as reported by The Hindu. More recently, in 2023, a fake video claiming that a temple in Uttar Pradesh was desecrated went viral on X, leading to protests in three districts before authorities debunked the claim, according to a Press Trust of India (PTI) report.
Local law enforcement agencies now face a new reality: “factories of rumor” that exploit social media to fan tensions and provoke violence. A 2024 study by the Observer Research Foundation (ORF) found that 60% of communal incidents in India between 2020 and 2023 were linked to misinformation spread via social media. These incidents highlight the urgent need for platforms to take responsibility for policing content and for governments to implement robust countermeasures.
Cyberbullying: A Growing Menace
Social media’s anonymity and reach have also made it a hotspot for cyberbullying, where disagreements can escalate into vicious attacks. A 2024 survey by the Cyberbullying Research Center revealed that 38% of Indian internet users aged 13–35 have experienced cyberbullying, with platforms like Instagram and X being the most common arenas. Victims often face relentless harassment, with bullies hiding behind fake accounts to target individuals or groups.
Consider the case of a 16-year-old girl from Mumbai who, in 2023, was driven to self-harm after being body-shamed in a viral Instagram post. The perpetrators, a group of anonymous users, coordinated their attack across multiple platforms, leaving the girl with little recourse. According to a 2024 report by the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB), cyberbullying-related complaints in India rose by 22% between 2022 and 2023, with women and teenagers being the most vulnerable groups. The psychological toll is immense—studies show that victims of cyberbullying are 2.3 times more likely to experience anxiety or depression, as per a 2023 report by the Indian Journal of Psychiatry.

Social Media and National Security: From Hate Speech to Violence
In India, social media’s role in amplifying hate speech and fueling violent extremism cannot be ignored. The country’s constitutional principles—freedom of speech, secularism, and equality—are often challenged by divisive narratives spread online. A single tweet or post can direct emotions and conversations, turning social media platforms into echo chambers of hate. For instance, during the 2020 Delhi riots, which claimed 53 lives, inflammatory posts on Facebook and WhatsApp were found to have played a significant role in mobilizing mobs, according to a 2021 Delhi Police investigation.
The trajectory from hate speech to violence is a growing concern. A 2024 report by the Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) noted that 70% of hate speech incidents on social media in India between 2022 and 2024 were linked to religious or political narratives, often orchestrated by “influencers” with large followings. These influencers can sway public sentiment with a single post, making it critical for authorities to monitor and counter such narratives.
Government Guidelines and Norms: A Proactive Response
Recognizing the challenges posed by social media, the Indian government has introduced several guidelines and regulations to curb misuse while balancing freedom of expression. Here are the latest measures as of May 2025:
  1. Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 (Updated 2024)
    • Social media platforms with over 5 million users in India are classified as “significant social media intermediaries” and must appoint a Chief Compliance Officer, a Nodal Contact Person, and a Resident Grievance Officer, all based in India.
    • Platforms are required to remove content identified as unlawful (e.g., hate speech, misinformation) within 36 hours of receiving a government or court order. A 2024 amendment mandates that platforms proactively identify and remove misinformation using AI-based tools.
    • WhatsApp and similar platforms must now enable traceability of messages in cases of serious crimes (e.g., those involving national security or public order), following a 2023 Supreme Court ruling upholding the government’s stance despite privacy concerns.
  2. Draft Data Protection Bill, 2023 (Enacted 2024)
    • The Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP Act), 2024, imposes strict penalties on platforms that fail to protect user data or allow its misuse for cyberbullying or targeted hate campaigns. Fines can go up to ₹250 crore per instance.
    • Platforms must obtain explicit user consent for data processing and provide mechanisms for users to report harmful content anonymously.
  3. Cybercrime Coordination Centre (I4C) Initiatives
    • The Indian Cybercrime Coordination Centre (I4C), under the Ministry of Home Affairs, launched a nationwide campaign in 2024 to combat fake news and cyberbullying. The “Cyber Dost” helpline (1930) has handled over 1.2 million complaints since its inception, with 30% related to social media misuse, as per a 2025 I4C report.
    • The I4C also collaborates with platforms to flag and remove content that violates India’s laws, such as the Indian Penal Code (IPC) sections on hate speech (Section 153A) and defamation (Section 499).
  4. National Security Directive on Social Media, 2025
    • In March 2025, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) issued a directive requiring platforms to deploy real-time monitoring systems to detect and remove content linked to terrorism, communal violence, or anti-national activities.
    • Platforms must submit monthly compliance reports to MeitY, detailing actions taken against harmful content. Non-compliance can result in a ban—X faced a temporary suspension in February 2025 for failing to comply, which was lifted after corrective measures.
Countering Extremism: A Call for Soft Power and Responsibility
As India prioritizes counter-terrorism and countering violent extremism (CVE), the role of social media in shaping narratives cannot be overlooked. The government is increasingly using “soft power” strategies to combat hate and misinformation:
  • Digital Literacy Campaigns: The “Digital India” initiative launched a nationwide digital literacy program in 2024, aiming to educate 100 million citizens on identifying fake news and reporting cyberbullying by 2026. As of May 2025, 45 million people have been trained, according to MeitY.
  • Counter-Narratives: The I4C has partnered with influencers and content creators to promote messages of unity and tolerance, countering divisive narratives. A 2025 campaign on X, #UnitedWeStand, garnered over 10 million impressions in its first month.
  • Community Engagement: Local police in states like Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra have set up “Social Media Monitoring Units” to track and debunk rumors in real time, preventing communal flare-ups.
However, the onus isn’t on the government alone. Social media companies must take responsibility for their platforms being used as echo chambers of hate. A 2024 survey by the Centre for Social Research (CSR) found that 82% of Indian users believe platforms like Facebook and X should do more to curb hate speech. Companies like Meta and X have started investing in AI tools to detect harmful content, but progress is slow—Meta reported removing 15 million pieces of hate speech content in India in 2024, yet many posts still slip through the cracks.
Conclusion: Navigating the Social Media Landscape
Social media is a powerful force in modern India, connecting millions while also posing unprecedented challenges. It has the potential to amplify voices, foster dialogue, and drive social change, but it can also fuel division, harassment, and violence if left unchecked. The Indian government’s latest guidelines, from the IT Rules to the DPDP Act, aim to strike a balance between freedom of expression and public safety, but their success depends on effective implementation and cooperation from social media platforms.
As users, we too have a role to play—verifying information before sharing, reporting harmful content, and promoting positive narratives. Together, we can ensure that social media remains a tool for connection and empowerment, not division and harm. Let’s ask ourselves: How can we use social media to build a better, more inclusive India? Share your thoughts in the comments below, and let’s start a conversation that matters.

Have you encountered fake news or cyberbullying on social media? Report it via the Cyber Dost helpline (1930) or your platform’s grievance mechanism. Together, we can make the digital world a safer space for all.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New-Age Free Trade Agreements: Shaping India’s Economic Future

     In an era of global economic realignment, India stands at a pivotal juncture, leveraging new-age Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) to propel its ambition of becoming a $5 trillion economy by 2030 and a global trade powerhouse. Unlike their predecessors, which focused narrowly on tariff reductions, modern FTAs are comprehensive, encompassing digital trade, intellectual property rights (IPR), sustainability, labor standards, and geopolitical strategies. For India, these agreements are not mere trade pacts but strategic instruments to drive export-led growth, attract foreign direct investment (FDI), enhance industrial competitiveness, and foster inclusive development.      As of May 2025, India’s merchandise exports stand at $437 billion (April 2024–February 2025), with services exports at $340 billion, and FTAs are poised to amplify these figures. Yet, the path is fraught with challenges—trade deficits, domestic capacity constraints, and geopolitical trade-of...

Unified Pension Scheme (UPS) vs. National Pension System (NPS)

  The Indian government's introduction of the Unified Pension Scheme (UPS), effective from April 1, 2025, marks a significant shift in retirement planning for central government employees. This new scheme aims to combine the predictability of the Old Pension Scheme (OPS) with the contributory nature of the National Pension System (NPS). For employees seeking a stable and assured post-retirement income, UPS presents a compelling alternative to the market-linked NPS. Key Differences Between UPS and NPS 1. Pension Structure 2. Employee and Government Contributions 3. Inflation Adjustment 4. Family Pension 5. Lump Sum Payment at Retirement Comparative Example: UPS vs. NPS UPS : Provides a guaranteed pension amounting to 50% of the average basic pay from the last 12 months of service, given a minimum of 25 years of service. For those with 10 to 25 years of service, the pension is proportionate to their service duration, with a minimum pension of ₹10,000 per month. NPS : Offers a p...

Understanding NPS and UPS Provisions Through Case Studies – Death and Disablement in Service

The National Pension System (NPS) and the Unified Pension Scheme (UPS) provide distinct benefits for Central Government employees in India, especially in cases of unforeseen events like death or disablement during service. To help employees and their families understand these provisions, we will analyze two real-world case studies based on the latest Office Memoranda (OMs): DoPPW OM dated October 26, 2022 (CCS NPS Rules, 2021) for NPS Finance Ministry Notification dated January 24, 2025 (UPS effective from April 1, 2025) These case studies will clarify benefits, eligibility criteria, and potential financial outcomes under both schemes. Case Study 1: NPS – Death of an Employee in Service Employee Profile Name: Rajesh Kumar Age: 42 Service Duration: 15 years (Joined on January 1, 2010) Basic Pay: ₹80,000/month (including Dearness Allowance) NPS Contribution: 10% (₹8,000/month) by Rajesh, 14% (₹11,200/month) by the government Accumulated Corpus: ₹45 lakh (by April 2025) Family: W...